
Construction Job Growth by City: The 2026 CB&C Construction Momentum Index
- Primary data
- BLS CES State and Area (August 2026), BLS QCEW (2020, 2025, Q1 2026), Census Vintage 2025
- Data period
- August 2025 to August 2026; 2020 to 2025; Q1 2025 to Q1 2026
- Latest release used
- 2026-09-30
- Next release
- 2026-10-28 (CES metro, September 2026); 2026-12-02 (QCEW, second quarter 2026)
- Geography
- 56 US metropolitan statistical areas with more than 1 million residents
- Sources
- 23 (20 Tier 1)
Construction job growth by city is fastest in Columbus, Ohio (16.1%) and St. Louis (13.8%) from August 2025 to August 2026 (BLS). On the CB&C Construction Momentum Index for 56 metros over 1 million people, Columbus, Raleigh, St. Louis, Indianapolis and Charlotte rank highest; San Francisco ranks last.
How the index is built
CB&C Construction Momentum Index 2026
FormulaIndex = (40 A + 25 B + 20 C + 15 D) / sum of weights with data; each component capped at P5/P95 and scaled 0 to 100
Inputs: fact sheet metro rows (CES Aug 2025 and Aug 2026; QCEW 2020 and 2025 NAICS 23 and total; QCEW Q1 2025 and Q1 2026 NAICS 236220); derived_metrics.csv {CBSA}-score-A to D (fact sheet rows)
Result: Columbus 99.0, Raleigh 90.6, St. Louis 87.2, Indianapolis 86.3, Charlotte 81.4; San Francisco last at 5.1
Construction hiring momentum in 2026 is strongest in mid-sized Midwest and Carolina metros, not in the largest construction markets.
Limitations: Weights are a judgment; C missing for 25 metros; A preliminary; mixed construction and mining, logging and construction series.
Rank stability under seven alternative designs
FormulaSpearman correlation of ranks, top-10 overlap and rank shifts vs baseline
Inputs: derived_metrics.csv {CBSA}-rank_* and sens_* (fact sheet rows)
Result: Correlation 0.889 to 0.994; six metros in the top 10 under every design: Columbus, OH; Raleigh, NC; St. Louis, MO; Indianapolis, IN; Charlotte, NC; Kansas City, MO
Top and bottom groups are stable; middle ranks move several places with weight choices.
Limitations: Variants are not exhaustive; the QCEW variant uses an earlier period.
Fastest risers and decliners (component A)
FormulaA = August 2026 / August 2025 - 1, CES not seasonally adjusted
Inputs: fact sheet CES metro rows; derived {CBSA}-A (fact sheet rows)
Result: Columbus +16.1%, St. Louis +13.8%; Pittsburgh -5.7%, Riverside -4.1%; 33 gainers, 23 decliners
The two largest gains were in Midwest metros; five of the 10 steepest declines were in California or Pennsylvania.
Limitations: Preliminary sample estimates; small changes are within sampling error.
Commercial building growth by metro (component C)
FormulaC = Q1 2026 / Q1 2025 - 1, NAICS 236220, matched disclosed counties
Inputs: fact sheet NAICS 236220 metro rows; derived {CBSA}-C (fact sheet rows)
Result: US +3.5%; Raleigh +13.4%, Denver +12.3%, Miami +10.2%; San Diego -7.2%
Commercial building employment is diverging from total construction in several metros, notably Miami and Denver.
Limitations: 31 of 56 metros; suppressed counties excluded; one-year quarterly change.
Florida metros vs Florida and the US
FormulaSame components computed for state and national totals
Inputs: fact sheet Florida and US rows; derived fl_* and us_* (fact sheet rows)
Result: Five-year: Florida 16.7% vs US 14.5%; 12-month: Florida 0.3% vs US 1.2%
Florida's construction job boom was a 2020 to 2025 story; in 2026 its large metros are flat to slightly negative.
Limitations: Florida state A uses construction only; metro A for Florida also uses construction only.
Construction share of job growth (component D)
FormulaD = (construction jobs 2025 - 2020) / (total jobs 2025 - 2020)
Inputs: fact sheet QCEW NAICS 23 and total covered rows; derived {CBSA}-D, us_D (fact sheet rows)
Result: US 6.3%; Kansas City 14.2%, Phoenix 14.0%, Milwaukee 15.3%; San Francisco -3.3%
Where D is high, construction carried a larger part of the local job recovery.
Limitations: 2020 base year; total covered jobs include government while NAICS 23 is private only.
How the CB&C Construction Momentum Index is built
The index scores the 56 US metropolitan statistical areas with more than 1 million residents on four public measures of construction employment: recent growth, five-year growth, commercial building growth and the share of all job growth that came from construction.
CB&C Construction Momentum Index: Index = (40 x A score + 25 x B score + 20 x C score + 15 x D score) / sum of the weights with data. Each score runs from 0 (weakest of the 56 metros) to 100 (strongest).
Large metro: A metropolitan statistical area with a July 1, 2025 population above 1,000,000 in the Census Bureau Vintage 2025 estimates. There are 56 (Census Bureau).
| Component | Measure | Period | Source | Weight (%) | Metros with data | Floor (P5, %) | Cap (P95, %) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Recent momentum | Construction employment change, same month a year earlier, not seasonally adjusted | August 2025 to August 2026 | BLS CES State and Area | 40 | 56 | -3.7 | 7.8 |
| B. Five-year growth | Private construction (NAICS 23) employment change, annual averages | 2020 to 2025 | BLS QCEW (CES annual averages where county coverage under 95%) | 25 | 56 | 0.9 | 32.0 |
| C. Commercial building | Commercial and institutional building (NAICS 236220) employment change, first-quarter averages | Q1 2025 to Q1 2026 | BLS QCEW (matched counties, coverage 80% or more) | 20 | 31 | -5.5 | 11.3 |
| D. Construction share of job growth | Change in construction employment divided by change in total employment | 2020 to 2025 | BLS QCEW (CES where flagged) | 15 | 56 | 0.9 | 13.8 |
Each component is capped at its 5th and 95th percentile across the large metros, then scaled 0 to 100. When component C is missing, the index divides by the weights of the components that have data.
Source: [1][7][8][9][10] U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Component A is the change in construction employment between August 2025 and August 2026 in the BLS Current Employment Statistics (CES) State and Area file, compared month to month a year apart so that no seasonal adjustment is needed. BLS publishes a construction-only series for 28 of the 56 metros and a combined mining, logging and construction series for the other 28; the index uses construction-only data wherever it exists.
Component B is the 2020 to 2025 change in private construction (NAICS 23) employment from the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW), a near-complete count of jobs covered by unemployment insurance. The QCEW files opened on 2026-10-08 carried no metro totals for the second half of 2025, and 18 of the 56 metros had different county definitions in the 2020 file, so CB&C rebuilt each metro from its counties on the July 2023 delineation. QCEW supplies B for 36 metros where the counties disclosed in both years hold at least 95% of covered jobs; the remaining 20 use CES annual averages.
Component C is the change in commercial and institutional building construction (NAICS 236220) jobs between the first quarter of 2025 and the first quarter of 2026, the latest QCEW quarter. BLS suppresses many detailed county cells for confidentiality, about 60% of the most detailed data according to the QCEW FAQ, so C exists for 31 metros where disclosed counties cover at least 80%. Component D divides the 2020 to 2025 change in construction jobs by the change in all jobs.
Scaling: each component is capped at its 5th and 95th percentile across metros, then scaled from 0 to 100. For A the floor is -3.7% and the cap 7.8%; for C the floor is -5.5% and the cap 11.3%. Recent growth carries the largest weight because the question is where jobs are being added in 2026.
Construction job growth by city: the 2026 ranking of 56 large metros
Columbus, Ohio, ranks first with 99.0 of 100, followed by Raleigh, St. Louis, Indianapolis and Charlotte. The bottom five are all on the West Coast or in Pennsylvania, with San Francisco last at 5.1.
Score 0 to 100; 40% recent 12-month growth, 25% five-year growth, 20% commercial building growth, 15% construction share of job growth
Source: CB&C analysis of BLS CES State and Area (August 2026, released 2026-09-30), BLS QCEW (2020, 2025, Q1 2026) and Census Vintage 2025; 56 MSAs over 1 million residents
Columbus scores 99.0 because it leads both growth components: construction employment rose 16.1% in the 12 months to August 2026 (+10,100 jobs), grew 38.1% from 2020 to 2025, and construction supplied 13.1% of all job growth in the metro over those five years (BLS CES and QCEW). Columbus has no commercial building score because too many of its county cells are suppressed.
Raleigh (90.6) combines 7.6% recent growth with the fastest commercial building gain among the 31 metros measured, 13.4%. St. Louis (87.2) added 11,200 construction jobs, up 13.8%, the second-fastest 12-month rate. Indianapolis (86.3), Charlotte (81.4), Phoenix (79.4), Omaha (78.5), Kansas City (77.2), Austin (74.1) and Milwaukee (74.1) complete the top 10.
Large size does not guarantee a high score. Houston added the most construction jobs of any large metro, 14,100, but ranks 17th because its commercial building jobs fell 1.1% and its five-year growth (16.8%) was close to the national 14.5%. New York ranks 50th after losing 6,400 jobs over 12 months.
Show all 56 rows
| Rank | Metro area (MSA) | Population 2025 | Index (0 to 100) | A: 12-month change (%) | A: 12-month change (thousand jobs) | B: 5-year change (%) | B source | C: commercial building change (%) | D: construction share of job growth (%) | CES series |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Columbus, OH | 2,242,028 | 99.0 | +16.1 | +10.1 | +38.1 | CES | n/a | 13.1 | Mining, logging and construction |
| 2 | Raleigh-Cary, NC | 1,595,720 | 90.6 | +7.6 | +4.1 | +28.6 | CES | +13.4 | 8.7 | Mining, logging and construction |
| 3 | St. Louis, MO-IL | 2,814,421 | 87.2 | +13.8 | +11.2 | +19.3 | CES | n/a | 13.7 | Mining, logging and construction |
| 4 | Indianapolis-Carmel-Greenwood, IN | 2,205,695 | 86.3 | +7.0 | +5.0 | +24.9 | QCEW | +9.4 | 11.4 | Construction |
| 5 | Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC | 2,938,830 | 81.4 | +7.8 | +6.6 | +21.0 | CES | n/a | 8.6 | Mining, logging and construction |
| 6 | Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ | 5,228,938 | 79.4 | +3.8 | +6.8 | +31.3 | QCEW | +6.1 | 14.0 | Construction |
| 7 | Omaha, NE-IA | 1,009,836 | 78.5 | +7.5 | +2.7 | +13.9 | QCEW | n/a | 12.4 | Mining, logging and construction |
| 8 | Kansas City, MO-KS | 2,270,682 | 77.2 | +4.4 | +2.9 | +23.7 | QCEW | +7.7 | 14.2 | Construction |
| 9 | Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX | 2,620,945 | 74.1 | +4.2 | +4.0 | +33.3 | QCEW | +5.7 | 7.9 | Mining, logging and construction |
| 10 | Milwaukee-Waukesha, WI | 1,575,010 | 74.1 | +5.2 | +2.1 | +17.6 | CES | n/a | 15.3 | Construction |
| 11 | Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI | 3,790,295 | 68.3 | +6.7 | +6.8 | +14.1 | QCEW | n/a | 7.6 | Mining, logging and construction |
| 12 | Greenville-Anderson-Greer, SC | 1,014,101 | 67.5 | +2.0 | +0.5 | +31.6 | CES | n/a | 9.2 | Mining, logging and construction |
| 13 | Tulsa, OK | 1,069,273 | 63.1 | +4.5 | +1.3 | +17.4 | QCEW | +3.2 | 10.3 | Construction |
| 14 | Salt Lake City-Murray, UT | 1,308,377 | 63.1 | +4.6 | +2.8 | +22.4 | QCEW | -0.1 | 10.0 | Mining, logging and construction |
| 15 | Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX | 8,477,157 | 62.1 | +3.0 | +8.1 | +22.3 | QCEW | +5.8 | 7.9 | Mining, logging and construction |
| 16 | Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT | 1,171,426 | 59.2 | +7.8 | +1.9 | +16.2 | CES | -5.6 | 6.9 | Mining, logging and construction |
| 17 | Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX | 7,904,627 | 59.1 | +5.5 | +14.1 | +16.8 | QCEW | -1.1 | 8.7 | Construction |
| 18 | Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN | 2,312,858 | 55.2 | +4.3 | +2.4 | +13.8 | CES | n/a | 6.1 | Mining, logging and construction |
| 19 | Las Vegas-Henderson-North Las Vegas, NV | 2,407,226 | 53.5 | +4.3 | +3.5 | +16.4 | QCEW | +2.0 | 4.5 | Construction |
| 20 | Rochester, NY | 1,056,149 | 52.3 | +1.2 | +0.3 | +19.5 | QCEW | n/a | 9.4 | Construction |
| 21 | Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI | 4,390,913 | 51.3 | -1.1 | -1.0 | +21.7 | QCEW | +6.6 | 10.3 | Mining, logging and construction |
| 22 | Tucson, AZ | 1,074,685 | 51.1 | +1.0 | +0.2 | +15.0 | QCEW | +5.1 | 10.3 | Construction |
| 23 | Nashville-Davidson–Murfreesboro–Franklin, TN | 2,197,416 | 50.8 | -2.7 | -1.8 | +34.4 | QCEW | n/a | 11.2 | Mining, logging and construction |
| 24 | San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA | 1,984,473 | 50.6 | +7.8 | +4.2 | +4.3 | QCEW | -0.9 | 3.0 | Construction |
| 25 | San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX | 2,813,140 | 48.1 | +2.9 | +2.0 | +20.9 | QCEW | -5.0 | 8.3 | Construction |
| 26 | Cleveland, OH | 2,165,775 | 47.6 | +1.8 | +0.8 | +12.7 | CES | n/a | 9.0 | Mining, logging and construction |
| 27 | Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL | 6,391,072 | 46.9 | -0.3 | -0.5 | +15.0 | QCEW | +10.2 | 5.2 | Construction |
| 28 | Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL | 3,418,895 | 45.9 | +1.6 | +1.6 | +16.2 | QCEW | +0.4 | 7.8 | Construction |
| 29 | Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN | 9,434,123 | 45.1 | +3.0 | +5.8 | +9.4 | CES | +4.2 | 3.9 | Construction |
| 30 | Denver-Aurora-Centennial, CO | 3,092,037 | 43.5 | +1.2 | +1.4 | +5.4 | QCEW | +12.3 | 3.2 | Mining, logging and construction |
| 31 | Jacksonville, FL | 1,785,500 | 42.8 | +0.7 | +0.4 | +17.6 | QCEW | -1.8 | 9.1 | Construction |
| 32 | Buffalo-Cheektowaga, NY | 1,155,653 | 42.7 | +0.4 | +0.1 | +13.1 | QCEW | +5.3 | 5.7 | Mining, logging and construction |
| 33 | Louisville/Jefferson County, KY-IN | 1,402,509 | 41.9 | -0.8 | -0.3 | +18.7 | CES | n/a | 8.8 | Mining, logging and construction |
| 34 | Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH | 5,034,221 | 40.3 | +2.0 | +2.5 | +9.4 | QCEW | +1.7 | 5.1 | Mining, logging and construction |
| 35 | Memphis, TN-MS-AR | 1,341,412 | 39.8 | +1.9 | +0.5 | +7.6 | CES | n/a | 6.9 | Mining, logging and construction |
| 36 | Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood, MI | 1,183,645 | 39.6 | -0.9 | -0.3 | +23.1 | QCEW | -3.5 | 9.2 | Mining, logging and construction |
| 37 | Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA | 6,482,182 | 39.0 | -2.1 | -3.4 | +22.2 | QCEW | n/a | 8.4 | Construction |
| 38 | Richmond, VA | 1,389,338 | 36.8 | -0.6 | -0.3 | +14.8 | CES | n/a | 7.4 | Mining, logging and construction |
| 39 | Oklahoma City, OK | 1,512,813 | 35.9 | +1.1 | +0.4 | +10.8 | CES | n/a | 4.3 | Construction |
| 40 | Fresno, CA | 1,203,383 | 30.4 | -1.2 | -0.3 | +19.0 | QCEW | -5.3 | 6.8 | Construction |
| 41 | Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL | 2,957,672 | 29.6 | -1.2 | -1.1 | +12.6 | QCEW | +1.1 | 4.0 | Construction |
| 42 | Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD | 2,857,781 | 29.3 | +1.8 | +1.5 | +3.8 | CES | n/a | 2.7 | Mining, logging and construction |
| 43 | Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD | 6,329,118 | 26.9 | -1.0 | -1.3 | +11.1 | QCEW | n/a | 4.2 | Mining, logging and construction |
| 44 | Providence-Warwick, RI-MA | 1,708,161 | 26.6 | -4.1 | -1.5 | +17.5 | CES | n/a | 7.7 | Construction |
| 45 | Birmingham, AL | 1,197,766 | 23.3 | -2.5 | -0.8 | +12.7 | QCEW | -4.4 | 8.2 | Construction |
| 46 | Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV | 6,465,724 | 22.0 | -1.8 | -3.1 | +8.2 | CES | n/a | 5.2 | Mining, logging and construction |
| 47 | Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA | 12,844,441 | 17.0 | -0.7 | -1.9 | +0.9 | QCEW | +0.1 | 0.4 | Construction |
| 48 | Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA | 4,161,883 | 15.0 | -0.2 | -0.3 | -2.5 | QCEW | n/a | -2.0 | Mining, logging and construction |
| 49 | Virginia Beach-Chesapeake-Norfolk, VA-NC | 1,797,213 | 14.5 | -3.2 | -1.4 | +8.1 | CES | n/a | 4.5 | Mining, logging and construction |
| 50 | New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ | 20,112,448 | 13.7 | -1.6 | -6.4 | +5.1 | CES | -3.4 | 1.5 | Mining, logging and construction |
| 51 | Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA | 2,477,274 | 12.0 | -3.1 | -2.4 | +6.4 | QCEW | n/a | 3.7 | Construction |
| 52 | San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, CA | 3,282,248 | 11.7 | -3.6 | -3.2 | +9.5 | QCEW | -7.2 | 4.6 | Construction |
| 53 | Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA | 2,542,282 | 11.4 | -3.2 | -2.6 | +5.3 | CES | n/a | 4.4 | Construction |
| 54 | Pittsburgh, PA | 2,421,992 | 10.1 | -5.7 | -3.5 | +0.9 | QCEW | +2.8 | 1.1 | Construction |
| 55 | Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA | 4,769,007 | 5.5 | -4.1 | -4.6 | +5.0 | QCEW | -5.0 | 2.4 | Construction |
| 56 | San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA | 4,630,041 | 5.1 | -2.5 | -3.0 | -3.6 | QCEW | n/a | -3.3 | Construction |
A uses August 2026 (preliminary) vs August 2025, not seasonally adjusted. B and D compare 2020 and 2025 annual averages. C compares first-quarter 2025 and 2026 averages of NAICS 236220 jobs in counties disclosed in both years (n/a where coverage is under 80%). CES series: BLS publishes construction alone for some metros and mining, logging and construction for others.
Source: [1][7][8][9][10][14] U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; U.S. Census Bureau
State-level results for commercial builders appear in the Commercial Builder Opportunity Index, which ranks all 50 states and DC on a different set of measures. Local contractor listings by city are in the CB&C locations directory.

Sensitivity test: do the ranks hold under other weights?
The ranking is stable at the top and bottom. Six metros stay in the top 10 under all eight designs tested: Columbus, OH; Raleigh, NC; St. Louis, MO; Indianapolis, IN; Charlotte, NC; Kansas City, MO.
| Variant | Weights A/B/C/D | Spearman vs baseline | Top-10 metros kept (of 10) | Median rank shift | Largest rank shift |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal weights | 25/25/25/25 | 0.969 | 10 | 2.0 | 13 |
| Momentum-heavy | 60/15/15/10 | 0.969 | 9 | 2.0 | 15 |
| Structural | 20/40/20/20 | 0.940 | 8 | 3.0 | 16 |
| No commercial component | 50/30/0/20 | 0.976 | 10 | 2.0 | 12 |
| Z-score scaling (baseline weights) | 40/25/20/15 | 0.994 | 10 | 1.0 | 7 |
| QCEW Q1 2026 change replaces CES for A | 40/25/20/15 | 0.889 | 9 | 3.0 | 20 |
| 2020 to 2025 commercial building change replaces C | 40/25/20/15 | 0.975 | 10 | 1.5 | 11 |
Spearman correlation compares all 56 ranks with the baseline. Top-10 kept counts baseline top-10 metros still in the top 10.
Source: [1][9][20] U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
With equal weights, the Spearman rank correlation with the baseline is 0.969 and all 10 baseline top-10 metros stay in the top 10. Switching from 0 to 100 scaling to capped z-scores changes little (correlation 0.994, largest shift 7 places). Among the weight sets, a structural weighting that puts 40% on five-year growth moves ranks the most (correlation 0.940, 8 of 10 kept).
The biggest test replaces CES component A with the QCEW change between the first quarter of 2025 and the first quarter of 2026, a full count but five months older. The correlation falls to 0.889 and one metro moves 20 places, which shows how fast metro construction readings change between quarters. Phoenix illustrates it: its CES series rose 3.8% to August 2026 while its QCEW count fell 1.2% in the year to the first quarter.
Score 0 to 100 under the baseline 40/25/20/15 weights and under equal 25% weights
Source: CB&C analysis of BLS CES State and Area (August 2026, released 2026-09-30), BLS QCEW (2020, 2025, Q1 2026) and Census Vintage 2025; 56 MSAs over 1 million residents
| Baseline rank | Metro | Equal weights | Momentum-heavy | Structural | No commercial component | Z-score scaling | QCEW Q1 for component A | 5-year commercial building for C |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Columbus, OH | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | Raleigh, NC | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 5 |
| 3 | St. Louis, MO | 3 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 4 | Indianapolis, IN | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 |
| 5 | Charlotte, NC | 9 | 4 | 10 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 6 |
| 6 | Phoenix, AZ | 5 | 10 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 16 | 4 |
| 7 | Omaha, NE | 8 | 6 | 12 | 7 | 9 | 5 | 8 |
| 8 | Kansas City, MO | 6 | 9 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 9 |
| 9 | Austin, TX | 10 | 12 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 7 |
| 10 | Milwaukee, WI | 7 | 8 | 11 | 10 | 10 | 7 | 10 |
| 11 | Minneapolis, MN | 15 | 7 | 18 | 13 | 12 | 29 | 13 |
| 12 | Greenville, SC | 11 | 19 | 8 | 15 | 11 | 14 | 14 |
| 13 | Tulsa, OK | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 14 | 11 | 15 |
| 14 | Salt Lake City, UT | 16 | 16 | 14 | 12 | 13 | 31 | 12 |
| 15 | Dallas, TX | 14 | 18 | 13 | 17 | 15 | 15 | 18 |
Ranks run from 1 to 56. See table t4 for the weights.
Source: [1][9][20] U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Fastest risers and decliners over the past 12 months
33 of the 56 large metros added construction jobs between August 2025 and August 2026 and 23 lost them. Columbus and St. Louis led by a wide margin; five of the 10 steepest declines were in California or Pennsylvania.
10 fastest and 10 slowest of 56 large metros, percent change in construction employment, not seasonally adjusted
Source: BLS CES State and Area, August 2026 preliminary (released 2026-09-30); CB&C calculations
The fastest 12-month rates were Columbus (16.1%), St. Louis (13.8%), Hartford, San Jose and Charlotte (each 7.8%), Raleigh (7.6%) and Omaha (7.5%). Nationally, construction employment rose 1.2% over the same months, not seasonally adjusted (BLS CES National).
The steepest declines were Pittsburgh (5.7%), Riverside and Providence (each 4.1%), San Diego (3.6%), Portland and Virginia Beach (each 3.2%) and Sacramento (3.1%). In job counts, New York lost the most (6,400), then Riverside (4,600) and Pittsburgh (3,500).
AGC's analysis of the same BLS release counted gains in 177 of 360 metro areas, 49%, including small metros (AGC). Among large metros the share with gains is higher, 33 of 56.
Which large metros have the most construction jobs
Job counts follow population: New York, Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston and Los Angeles each have more than 250,000 construction jobs, but none of them ranks in the index top 10.
| Rank | Metro area | August 2026 (thousands) | August 2025 (thousands) | Change (thousands) | Change (%) | CES series |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ | 383.7 | 390.1 | -6.4 | -1.6 | Mining, logging and construction |
| 2 | Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX | 276.2 | 268.1 | +8.1 | +3.0 | Mining, logging and construction |
| 3 | Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX | 269.0 | 254.9 | +14.1 | +5.5 | Construction |
| 4 | Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA | 252.6 | 254.5 | -1.9 | -0.7 | Construction |
| 5 | Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN | 199.7 | 193.9 | +5.8 | +3.0 | Construction |
| 6 | Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ | 185.6 | 178.8 | +6.8 | +3.8 | Construction |
| 7 | Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV | 172.3 | 175.4 | -3.1 | -1.8 | Mining, logging and construction |
| 8 | Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL | 159.7 | 160.2 | -0.5 | -0.3 | Construction |
| 9 | Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA | 154.9 | 158.3 | -3.4 | -2.1 | Construction |
| 10 | Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD | 128.3 | 129.6 | -1.3 | -1.0 | Mining, logging and construction |
| 11 | Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH | 126.0 | 123.5 | +2.5 | +2.0 | Mining, logging and construction |
| 12 | Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA | 124.0 | 124.3 | -0.3 | -0.2 | Mining, logging and construction |
| 13 | San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA | 116.0 | 119.0 | -3.0 | -2.5 | Construction |
| 14 | Denver-Aurora-Centennial, CO | 114.2 | 112.8 | +1.4 | +1.2 | Mining, logging and construction |
| 15 | Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI | 108.3 | 101.5 | +6.8 | +6.7 | Mining, logging and construction |
CES not seasonally adjusted estimates. Series marked mining, logging and construction include a small mining and logging share and are not strictly comparable with construction-only series.
Source: [1] U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
New York had 383.7 thousand mining, logging and construction jobs in August 2026, Dallas-Fort Worth 276.2 thousand, Houston 269.0 thousand and Los Angeles 252.6 thousand (BLS CES, not seasonally adjusted). Construction pay in these markets is covered in the construction pay by metro report; this report covers job counts and growth only.
Where commercial building construction is growing or shrinking
Commercial and institutional building jobs rose 3.5% nationally between the first quarters of 2025 and 2026. Among 31 large metros with enough disclosed data, 19 grew and 12 shrank.
Commercial and institutional building construction (NAICS 236220): Establishments mainly responsible for building, adding to, altering, maintaining or repairing commercial and institutional buildings, including general contractors and design-build firms (Census NAICS). Specialty trade subcontractors are counted elsewhere.
NAICS 236220, 10 fastest-growing and 10 weakest of 31 large metros with county coverage of 80% or more
Source: BLS QCEW open data, NAICS 236220, Q1 2025 and Q1 2026 county files; CB&C calculations
Raleigh (13.4%), Denver (12.3%), Miami (10.2%), Indianapolis (9.4%) and Kansas City (7.7%) posted the fastest commercial building gains. Miami added the most jobs in the segment, about 1,554, and Dallas-Fort Worth about 1,316 (BLS QCEW).
San Diego (7.2%), Hartford (5.6%), Fresno (5.3%), Riverside and San Antonio (each 5.0%) shrank fastest. New York lost the most commercial building jobs, about 1,143, a 3.4% drop.
Show all 32 rows
| Metro area | Q1 2025 jobs | Q1 2026 jobs | Change (jobs) | Change (%) | County coverage (%) | 2020 to 2025 change (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raleigh-Cary, NC | 3,649 | 4,138 | +489 | +13.4 | 89.3 | +37.9 |
| Denver-Aurora-Centennial, CO | 8,453 | 9,495 | +1,042 | +12.3 | 81.0 | n/a |
| Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL | 15,256 | 16,810 | +1,554 | +10.2 | 100.0 | +23.0 |
| Indianapolis-Carmel-Greenwood, IN | 5,325 | 5,823 | +498 | +9.4 | 80.8 | n/a |
| Kansas City, MO-KS | 5,683 | 6,121 | +438 | +7.7 | 80.2 | n/a |
| Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI | 7,370 | 7,857 | +487 | +6.6 | 96.6 | +29.5 |
| Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ | 18,713 | 19,863 | +1,151 | +6.1 | 96.6 | +55.2 |
| Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX | 22,843 | 24,159 | +1,316 | +5.8 | 94.4 | +33.8 |
| Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX | 8,981 | 9,496 | +515 | +5.7 | 97.4 | +69.5 |
| Buffalo-Cheektowaga, NY | 1,353 | 1,425 | +72 | +5.3 | 100.0 | +31.8 |
| Tucson, AZ | 1,809 | 1,901 | +92 | +5.1 | 100.0 | +22.0 |
| Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN | 16,016 | 16,681 | +665 | +4.2 | 96.9 | +26.0 |
| Tulsa, OK | 2,642 | 2,727 | +85 | +3.2 | 90.7 | n/a |
| Pittsburgh, PA | 5,017 | 5,158 | +142 | +2.8 | 81.1 | n/a |
| Las Vegas-Henderson-North Las Vegas, NV | 7,113 | 7,258 | +145 | +2.0 | 100.0 | +27.3 |
| Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH | 10,185 | 10,363 | +178 | +1.7 | 90.9 | +12.8 |
| Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL | 9,156 | 9,258 | +102 | +1.1 | 91.6 | +26.7 |
| Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL | 7,707 | 7,739 | +32 | +0.4 | 96.5 | +27.0 |
| Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA | 25,223 | 25,259 | +36 | +0.1 | 100.0 | +4.2 |
| Salt Lake City-Murray, UT | 5,197 | 5,192 | -5 | -0.1 | 97.5 | +32.1 |
| San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA | 3,976 | 3,939 | -37 | -0.9 | 100.0 | -1.6 |
| Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX | 20,281 | 20,054 | -227 | -1.1 | 98.2 | +21.4 |
| Jacksonville, FL | 3,548 | 3,484 | -64 | -1.8 | 91.4 | +36.8 |
| New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ | 33,950 | 32,808 | -1,143 | -3.4 | 97.4 | +5.3 |
| Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood, MI | 2,813 | 2,716 | -97 | -3.5 | 94.6 | +28.4 |
| Birmingham, AL | 4,188 | 4,003 | -185 | -4.4 | 93.6 | +18.0 |
| San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX | 6,911 | 6,564 | -347 | -5.0 | 92.8 | +38.0 |
| Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA | 6,217 | 5,904 | -313 | -5.0 | 100.0 | -1.4 |
| Fresno, CA | 1,552 | 1,470 | -82 | -5.3 | 100.0 | +11.1 |
| Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT | 1,366 | 1,289 | -77 | -5.6 | 87.7 | n/a |
| San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, CA | 9,970 | 9,252 | -717 | -7.2 | 100.0 | +28.7 |
| United States | 737,266 | 762,723 | +25,457 | +3.5 | 100.0 | n/a |
First-quarter average of monthly employment, private ownership, summed over counties disclosed in both quarters. Coverage is the share of the metro's 2025 covered employment in those counties. The 2020 to 2025 column uses annual averages and appears only where matched counties cover at least 80%.
Source: [9][10] U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Florida metros vs the nation
Three of Florida's four large metros grew faster than the US from 2020 to 2025, but only Tampa beat the national rate over the past 12 months. Miami ranks highest at 27th; Tampa is 28th, Jacksonville 31st and Orlando 41st.
Percent change: 12 months to August 2026, 2020 to 2025, and commercial building Q1 2025 to Q1 2026
Source: BLS CES State and Area and National (August 2026), BLS QCEW (2020, 2025, Q1 2026); CB&C calculations
From 2020 to 2025, private construction jobs grew 17.6% in Jacksonville, 16.2% in Tampa, 15.0% in Miami and 12.6% in Orlando, against 16.7% for Florida and 14.5% for the US (BLS QCEW). Over the 12 months to August 2026, Florida construction employment rose only 0.3%, below the national 1.2%.
Within the Miami metro, construction jobs rose 0.9% in the Fort Lauderdale division and fell 0.5% in Miami-Dade and 1.6% in West Palm Beach (BLS CES). Commercial building is the exception: Miami's NAICS 236220 jobs rose 10.2%, nearly three times the national 3.5%. Local firm listings are on the Miami commercial builders page.
| Area | Index rank (of 56) | A: 12-month change (%) | B: 5-year change (%) | C: commercial building change (%) | D: construction share of job growth (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miami, FL | 27 | -0.3 | +15.0 | +10.2 | 5.2 |
| Tampa, FL | 28 | +1.6 | +16.2 | +0.4 | 7.8 |
| Jacksonville, FL | 31 | +0.7 | +17.6 | -1.8 | 9.1 |
| Orlando, FL | 41 | -1.2 | +12.6 | +1.1 | 4.0 |
| Fort Lauderdale division | n/a | +0.9 | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Miami-Dade division | n/a | -0.5 | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| West Palm Beach division | n/a | -1.6 | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Florida (state) | n/a | +0.3 | +16.7 | +4.1 | 6.4 |
| United States | n/a | +1.2 | +14.5 | +3.5 | 6.3 |
Metropolitan divisions are parts of the Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach MSA; only the 12-month change is published for them here. Florida and US rows use state and national files.
Source: [1][6][7][8][9][10] U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Thousands of jobs, not seasonally adjusted
Source: BLS CES State and Area, not seasonally adjusted (August 2026 preliminary)
| Month | Miami, FL (thousands) | Tampa, FL (thousands) | Jacksonville, FL (thousands) | Orlando, FL (thousands) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01 | 158.2 | 95.5 | 53.0 | 92.9 |
| 2025-02 | 159.8 | 97.0 | 53.6 | 93.8 |
| 2025-03 | 159.9 | 98.2 | 54.0 | 93.9 |
| 2025-04 | 159.4 | 98.5 | 53.7 | 93.4 |
| 2025-05 | 159.9 | 99.1 | 54.0 | 93.4 |
| 2025-06 | 160.1 | 98.7 | 54.1 | 93.5 |
| 2025-07 | 159.3 | 98.0 | 54.0 | 93.0 |
| 2025-08 | 160.2 | 98.0 | 53.7 | 93.0 |
| 2025-09 | 160.3 | 97.4 | 53.6 | 92.4 |
| 2025-10 | 159.9 | 97.0 | 53.7 | 92.0 |
| 2025-11 | 159.6 | 97.4 | 53.7 | 91.4 |
| 2025-12 | 159.2 | 97.3 | 53.3 | 91.0 |
| 2026-01 | 156.0 | 95.9 | 52.8 | 89.7 |
| 2026-02 | 157.9 | 97.5 | 53.4 | 90.2 |
| 2026-03 | 157.7 | 98.1 | 53.4 | 90.4 |
| 2026-04 | 158.6 | 99.2 | 53.7 | 91.4 |
| 2026-05 | 158.2 | 99.2 | 54.0 | 93.1 |
| 2026-06 | 158.9 | 99.5 | 54.0 | 93.3 |
| 2026-07 | 159.8 | 99.7 | 54.1 | 93.6 |
| 2026-08 | 159.7 | 99.6 | 54.1 | 91.9 |
CES not seasonally adjusted, thousands; August 2026 is preliminary.
Source: [1] U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Latest national check: construction jobs through September 2026
National data released on 2026-10-02 show construction still adding jobs slowly, which frames the metro results above.
US construction employment changed little in September 2026 (+11,000), after an average gain of 10,000 jobs per month over the prior 12 months (BLS Employment Situation). Seasonally adjusted employment was 8.364 million in September 2026, up 1.3% from 8.255 million a year earlier (BLS CES National).
National commercial building employment, seasonally adjusted, rose 3.6% from 759.2 thousand in August 2025 to 786.2 thousand in August 2026, close to the 3.5% QCEW gain in the first quarter. The workforce side of the market, openings and hires, is covered in the construction labor shortage report.
What the index cannot tell you
The index measures payroll jobs, not project pipelines, profits or pay, and its newest month will be revised.
- August 2026 metro figures are preliminary and will be revised next month and again at the annual benchmark.
- 28 metros are measured with a mining, logging and construction series; mining and logging are small in most large metros but not zero.
- QCEW counts jobs by employer location; contractors working across metro lines are counted where the establishment is.
- Component C covers only 31 metros because detailed county data are suppressed; metros without C are scored on the other three components.
- The 2020 base year was a pandemic year; five-year growth and construction's share of job growth are larger where total jobs fell more in 2020.
- Weights are a judgment; the sensitivity section shows how far ranks move under other choices.
Key findings
- Columbus, Ohio, construction employment rose 16.1% (+10,100 jobs) from August 2025 to August 2026, the fastest of 56 large US metros.[1]
- St. Louis construction employment rose 13.8% (+11,200 jobs) from August 2025 to August 2026.[1]
- Houston added 14,100 construction jobs from August 2025 to August 2026, the largest gain among large US metros.[1][23]
- New York-Newark-Jersey City lost 6,400 mining, logging and construction jobs from August 2025 to August 2026, the largest loss among large metros.[1]
- Pittsburgh construction employment fell 5.7% from August 2025 to August 2026, the steepest decline among large metros.[1]
- 33 of the 56 US metros with more than 1 million residents added construction jobs between August 2025 and August 2026.[1][14]
- US construction employment rose 1.2% from August 2025 to August 2026, not seasonally adjusted (8.452 million to 8.553 million).[6]
- US private construction employment grew 14.5% from 2020 to 2025, from 7,203,279 to 8,251,002 jobs (annual averages).[7][8]
- US commercial and institutional building employment rose 3.5% from the first quarter of 2025 to the first quarter of 2026.[9]
- Raleigh commercial building employment rose 13.4% from the first quarter of 2025 to the first quarter of 2026, the fastest of 31 large metros measured.[9]
- Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach commercial building employment rose 10.2% in the year to the first quarter of 2026 while total construction jobs fell 0.3% in the year to August 2026.[1][9]
- Construction accounted for 6.3% of all US job growth from 2020 to 2025, and 13.1% in Columbus.[1][7][8][10]
- San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont ranks last of 56 on the index (5.1); its private construction jobs fell 3.6% from 2020 to 2025.[7][8]
Summary for decision makers
- Columbus, Ohio, ranks first on the CB&C Construction Momentum Index with 99.0 of 100; Raleigh (90.6) and St. Louis (87.2) follow.
- 33 of 56 large metros added construction jobs between August 2025 and August 2026; 23 lost them (BLS CES, not seasonally adjusted).
- US construction employment rose 1.2% over the same 12 months, so the leaders grew several times faster than the nation.
- Houston added the most construction jobs, 14,100; New York lost the most, 6,400.
- Commercial building jobs (NAICS 236220) rose 3.5% nationally in the year to the first quarter of 2026, led by Raleigh (13.4%) and Denver (12.3%).
- Florida's four large metros rank between 27th and 41st; Miami's commercial building jobs rose 10.2% while its total construction jobs slipped 0.3%.
- Six metros stay in the top 10 under all eight index designs tested: Columbus, OH; Raleigh, NC; St. Louis, MO; Indianapolis, IN; Charlotte, NC; Kansas City, MO.
Questions people ask
Which cities have the most construction jobs?
In August 2026, New York had 383.7 thousand mining, logging and construction jobs, Dallas-Fort Worth 276.2 thousand, Houston 269.0 thousand, Los Angeles 252.6 thousand and Chicago 199.7 thousand (BLS CES). See table t5.
Where is construction booming in 2026?
Among large metros, the fastest 12-month gains to August 2026 were in Columbus (16.1%), St. Louis (13.8%), Charlotte (7.8%), Raleigh (7.6%) and Omaha (7.5%); Houston added the most jobs (14,100).
Is construction slowing down in my city?
Check your metro in table t2. 23 of 56 large metros had fewer construction jobs in August 2026 than a year earlier, while US construction employment grew 1.2%. A change of 1% or 2% in one metro may be revised, so compare several months before drawing conclusions.
Which cities are losing construction jobs?
Pittsburgh (5.7%), Riverside (4.1%), Providence (4.1%), San Diego (3.6%) and Portland (3.2%) had the steepest 12-month declines to August 2026; New York lost the most jobs (6,400).
Is Miami construction growing?
Slightly down in the short run, up over five years. Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach construction jobs fell 0.3% from 160.2 thousand in August 2025 to 159.7 thousand in August 2026, after growing 15.0% from 2020 to 2025; commercial building jobs rose 10.2% in the year to the first quarter of 2026 (BLS).
For journalists and researchers
If you cite only a few, cite these
- Columbus, Ohio, ranks first of 56 large US metros on the CB&C Construction Momentum Index 2026 with 99.0 of 100.[1][7][8]
- 33 of 56 US metros over 1 million residents added construction jobs between August 2025 and August 2026 (BLS CES).[1]
- US commercial building employment rose 3.5% from the first quarter of 2025 to the first quarter of 2026 (BLS QCEW).[9]
Most quotable statistics
- Columbus, Ohio, construction employment rose 16.1% from August 2025 to August 2026, the fastest of 56 US metros over 1 million residents (BLS CES).[1]
- 33 of 56 large US metros added construction jobs between August 2025 and August 2026; 23 lost them (BLS CES).[1]
- Houston added 14,100 construction jobs from August 2025 to August 2026, more than any other large metro (BLS CES).[1]
- US commercial and institutional building employment rose 3.5% from the first quarter of 2025 to the first quarter of 2026 (BLS QCEW).[9]
- Miami commercial building employment rose 10.2% in the year to the first quarter of 2026, nearly three times the national rate (BLS QCEW).[9]
- Construction accounted for 6.3% of all US job growth from 2020 to 2025 (BLS QCEW).[7][8][10]
Press summary
Construction jobs are growing fastest in mid-sized Midwest and Carolina metros, not in the biggest construction markets, according to the CB&C Construction Momentum Index, a ranking of the 56 US metros over 1 million residents built from Bureau of Labor Statistics data. Columbus, Ohio, ranks first with 99.0 of 100 after construction employment rose 16.1% between August 2025 and August 2026. Raleigh, St. Louis, Indianapolis and Charlotte complete the top five. 33 of the 56 large metros added construction jobs over the year, while US construction employment grew 1.2%. Houston added the most jobs, 14,100; New York lost the most, 6,400. Commercial building employment rose 3.5% nationally in the year to the first quarter of 2026, led by Raleigh, Denver and Miami. Three of Florida's four large metros grew faster than the nation from 2020 to 2025, but only Tampa has kept pace over the past year. The top group holds under seven alternative index designs.
Suggested headlines
- Columbus Leads US Construction Job Growth With 16.1% Gain Over the Past Year
- 33 of 56 Large US Metros Added Construction Jobs in the Year to August 2026
- Midwest and Carolina Metros Outpace Most Sun Belt Giants in 2026 Construction Hiring
- Miami Commercial Building Jobs Up 10.2% as Total Construction Jobs Stall
- West Coast Metros Take Four of the Bottom Five Places on the 2026 Construction Momentum Index
How to cite this report
Commercial Builders & Contractors. (2026). Construction Job Growth by City: The 2026 CB&C Construction Momentum Index. Retrieved from https://commercialbuildersandcontractors.com/construction-jobs-by-metro/
Reuse license
Data and tables are licensed CC BY 4.0. Attribution: “Source: Commercial Builders & Contractors, Construction Job Growth by City: The 2026 CB&C Construction Momentum Index” with a link to this page.
Download the data
Every table in this report is available as a CSV under CC BY 4.0. The fact sheet lists each value with its source URL and access date.
- derived_metrics.csv (CSV)
- fact_sheet.csv (CSV)
- CB&C Construction Momentum Index: components, weights and scaling bounds (CSV)
- Construction job growth by city: CB&C Construction Momentum Index for all 56 US metros over 1 million residents, 2026 (CSV)
- Rank of the baseline top 15 metros under seven alternative index designs (CSV)
- Sensitivity test: rank stability of the index under seven alternative designs (CSV)
- Large metros with the most construction jobs, August 2026 (CSV)
- Commercial and institutional building (NAICS 236220) jobs in 31 large metros, first quarter 2025 vs first quarter 2026 (CSV)
- Florida metros vs Florida and the United States on the four index components (CSV)
- Monthly construction employment in Florida's four large metros, January 2025 to August 2026 (CSV)
Frequently asked questions
What is the CB&C Construction Momentum Index?
A 0 to 100 score for the 56 US metros with more than 1 million residents, combining 12-month construction job growth (40%), 2020 to 2025 growth (25%), commercial building job growth (20%) and construction's share of all job growth (15%), all from BLS data.
Which city has the fastest construction job growth in 2026?
Among large metros, Columbus, Ohio: construction employment rose 16.1% between August 2025 and August 2026 (BLS CES). St. Louis was second at 13.8%.
How many large metros are adding construction jobs?
33 of 56 metros over 1 million residents added construction jobs between August 2025 and August 2026, and 23 lost jobs (BLS CES, not seasonally adjusted).
How fast are construction jobs growing nationally?
US construction employment rose 1.2% from August 2025 to August 2026 and 1.3% from September 2025 to September 2026, seasonally adjusted (BLS).
Which metro added the most construction jobs?
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands added 14,100 construction jobs from August 2025 to August 2026, up 5.5% (BLS CES).
Where is commercial building construction employment growing fastest?
Raleigh (13.4%), Denver (12.3%) and Miami (10.2%) led 31 large metros from the first quarter of 2025 to the first quarter of 2026, against 3.5% nationally (BLS QCEW).
How do Florida metros compare with the US?
From 2020 to 2025, construction jobs grew 12.6% to 17.6% in Florida's four large metros vs 14.5% nationally, but Florida's 12-month growth to August 2026 was 0.3% vs 1.2% for the US (BLS).
Why does the index use not seasonally adjusted data?
BLS publishes metro construction series not seasonally adjusted, so the index compares the same month a year apart, August 2026 with August 2025, which removes the seasonal pattern.
How reliable are metro construction job estimates?
They are sample estimates that BLS revises. In August 2026, BLS found 373 of 387 metros had total job changes too small to be statistically significant, so small construction changes in one metro are a direction, not a firm number.
When will this data be updated?
BLS releases September 2026 metro data on 2026-10-28 and second quarter 2026 QCEW county data on 2026-12-02 (BLS release schedules).
Methodology
Selection: the 56 metropolitan statistical areas with a July 1, 2025 population above 1 million in the Census Bureau Vintage 2025 estimates, on the July 2023 OMB delineation. Only Tier 1 government files feed the index; AGC, Construction Coverage and ColoradoBiz are used only for comparison.
Component A uses the BLS CES State and Area file (updated 2026-09-18, August 2026 preliminary, benchmark year 2025), comparing August 2026 with August 2025 not seasonally adjusted. Where BLS publishes construction alone it is used; otherwise the mining, logging and construction series is used and flagged.
Components B and D use QCEW annual averages for 2020 and 2025. Because the open-data files carried no 2025 metro totals for the third and fourth quarters and 18 metros had different county lists in 2020, metros were rebuilt from county records using only counties disclosed in both years. Where those counties held less than 95% of the metro's 2025 covered jobs, CES annual averages replaced QCEW (20 metros). The quarterly-to-annual method was validated on 2024, where averaging 12 monthly levels matched the published annual average within 0.5 jobs in all 344 metros with data.
Component C uses QCEW NAICS 236220 private employment, first-quarter averages of monthly levels for 2025 and 2026, summed over counties disclosed in both quarters, for metros where those counties held at least 80% of covered jobs (31 metros).
Scaling and weights: each component is capped at its 5th and 95th percentile and scaled 0 to 100; the index is the weighted mean (A 40, B 25, C 20, D 15) of the components with data. Seven alternatives were tested: equal weights, momentum-heavy, structural, no commercial component, capped z-scores, QCEW first-quarter change for A, and 2020 to 2025 commercial building change for C.
Conflicts: where CES and QCEW disagree, both are shown and the sensitivity test reports the effect. AGC's published metro figures were checked against the BLS file; Houston matched, and figures that could not be reproduced were not used (see excluded.md).
Limitations: preliminary data, sampling error, mixed series definitions, suppression of detailed county data, and a pandemic base year. All calculations are in derived_metrics.csv and the scripts folder. Last updated 2026-10-08.
This report presents published data with its limitations. It is not legal, financial or investment advice.
Sources, ranked by quality
Tier 1: primary and official sources (20)
- [1] U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. CES State and Area Employment flat files: sm.data.62.Construction.Current, sm.data.61.MiningLoggingConstr.Current, sm.data.54.TotalNonFarm.All (updated 2026-09-18). January 2020 to August 2026 (August 2026 preliminary). Accessed 2026-10-08.
- [2] U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. CES State and Area series catalog and file documentation (sm.series, sm.txt). Benchmark year 2025. Accessed 2026-10-08.
- [3] U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Metropolitan Area Employment and Unemployment, August 2026 (news release USDL-26-1548, September 30, 2026). August 2026. Accessed 2026-10-08.
- [4] U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Metropolitan Area Employment and Unemployment Technical Note. Current methods. Accessed 2026-10-08.
- [5] U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. The Employment Situation, September 2026 (news release USDL-26-1549, October 2, 2026). September 2026. Accessed 2026-10-08.
- [6] U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. CES National flat file: ce.data.20a.Construction.Employment (series CES2000000001, CEU2000000001, CES2023622001). 2020 to September 2026. Accessed 2026-10-08.
- [7] U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. QCEW open data, NAICS 23 construction, 2020 annual averages (county, MSA, state, US). 2020 annual average. Accessed 2026-10-08.
- [8] U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. QCEW open data, NAICS 23 construction, 2025 annual averages. 2025 annual average. Accessed 2026-10-08.
- [9] U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. QCEW open data, NAICS 236220 commercial and institutional building construction, first quarter 2026 (with first quarter 2025 file at /2025/1/). Q1 2025 and Q1 2026. Accessed 2026-10-08.
- [10] U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. QCEW open data, total covered employment (industry 10), 2025 annual averages (with 2020 file at /2020/a/). 2020 and 2025 annual averages. Accessed 2026-10-08.
- [11] U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. County Employment and Wages, First Quarter 2026 (news release USDL-26-1424, August 28, 2026). First quarter 2026. Accessed 2026-10-08.
- [12] U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. QCEW Open Data Access (CSV slice documentation). Current. Accessed 2026-10-08.
- [13] U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. QCEW Questions and Answers (confidentiality and suppression). Current. Accessed 2026-10-08.
- [14] U.S. Census Bureau. Vintage 2025 population estimates for metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas (cbsa-est2025-alldata.csv). July 1, 2025. Accessed 2026-10-08.
- [15] U.S. Census Bureau. Metropolitan and Micropolitan Statistical Areas Population Totals and Components of Change: 2020-2025 (March 2026). 2020 to 2025. Accessed 2026-10-08.
- [16] U.S. Census Bureau. CBSA delineation file, July 2023 (list1_2023.xlsx, OMB Bulletin 23-01 counties). July 2023 delineation. Accessed 2026-10-08.
- [17] U.S. Census Bureau. Delineation Files (metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas reference files). 2023. Accessed 2026-10-08.
- [18] U.S. Census Bureau. North American Industry Classification System 2022: 236220 Commercial and Institutional Building Construction. NAICS 2022. Accessed 2026-10-08.
- [19] U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Industries at a Glance: Construction, NAICS 23. Current. Accessed 2026-10-08.
- [20] U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. QCEW open data, NAICS 23 construction, first quarter 2026 (with first quarter 2025 file at /2025/1/). Q1 2025 and Q1 2026. Accessed 2026-10-08.
Tier 2: trade bodies, market research, company data (2)
- [21] Associated General Contractors of America. Construction Employment Grows in Just Under Half of Metro Areas (September 30, 2026). August 2025 to August 2026. Accessed 2026-10-08.
- [22] Construction Coverage. Cities With the Most Construction Workers (published 2025-08-04). 2024 to 2025 data. Accessed 2026-10-08.
Tier 3: journalism and expert commentary (1)
- [23] ColoradoBiz. Construction jobs rise in 49% of metro areas led by Texas and Louisiana gains (September 30, 2026). August 2025 to August 2026. Accessed 2026-10-08.